π₯ Regulatory Report Salad
This salad keeps indefinitely. Unlike food, regulatory documents do not expire. . . . To reheat: issue a "modernization" proposal that changes 3% of the text and generates 400 pages of public comments, none of which alter the outcome.
With the growing food crisis driving prices higher and squeezing real households, no one in power seems interested in actually growing more food. Since the regime prefers producing policy over grain, I thought we might as well eat the paperwork.
A Contemporary Dish for the Modern Policy Kitchen
Difficulty: Moderate (requires sustained absence of critical thought)
Prep time: 6β18 months of stakeholder engagement
Cook time: One election cycle
Servings: Approximately 330 million, though most receive no portion
Ingredients
The Base (Select any combination β measurements don't matter, nobody checks)
| Ingredient | Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Pursuant to | 3β5 references per page | The flour of policy writing β provides structural nothingness |
| Hereinafter referred to as | 2β3 per section | Essential for renaming simple things into intimidating things |
| Notwithstanding the foregoing | 1 per regulatory layer | The gluten that binds contradictory clauses together |
| Subject to | To taste | Adds conditional uncertainty without resolving anything |
| In accordance with | Generous | Creates the illusion of following rules while writing new ones |
| As such | Sprinkle liberally | "Expressions such as as such, thereof, hereinafter, subject to, and pursuant to β these are the quiet hallmarks of legal and bureaucratic prose" |
The Body (Choose 2β3 regulatory frameworks β they blend interchangeably)
| Ingredient | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Financial surveillance thresholds | 1 framework, outdated | FINRA 2026 Annual Regulatory Oversight Report β "Do your firm's surveillance controls reflect current market conditions?" (implied answer: no) |
| Capital requirement modernization | 3 proposals, conflicting | Federal Reserve, March 19, 2026 β "better align regulatory capital with risk" while "maintaining safety and soundness" (these goals are in tension; do not resolve) |
| AML/CFT program rewrites | 1 rollback, lightly regulated | Federal regulators "pulling back on prescriptive requirements" in April 2026 |
| Crypto asset tokenization guidance | 1 monitoring framework | FINRA is "actively monitoring and responding to market, legislative and policy developments" β i.e., watching without acting |
| National Money Laundering Risk Assessment | 1 PDF, 246 pages | Treasury Department, 2026 β "primarily relies on open-source reporting" (they Googled it) |
The Dressing (Whisk vigorously until opaque)
| Ingredient | Amount | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| "Comprehensive framework" | 1 phrase | Covers the absence of specificity |
| "Robust oversight" | 1 phrase | Covers the absence of enforcement |
| "Stakeholder engagement" | 1 phrase | Covers the absence of affected people in the room |
| "Phased implementation timeline" | 1 phrase | Covers the absence of urgency |
| "Aligned with international best practices" | 1 phrase | Covers the absence of any actual international agreement |
| "Pursuant to Section 163 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. Β§ 2213)" | 1 citation, verbatim | Adds intimidating legal weight to a document nobody will read past page 2 |
The Garnish
| Ingredient | Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| A reciprocal tariff schedule | 1 Excel file, unviewable in browser | "To read the tariff schedule, click here" β link may or may not work |
| An emergency power invocation | 1 per quarter | Courts may strike down; simply re-invoke under different authority |
| A joint statement from a summit | 1, location preferably dramatic | e.g., "the political agreement reached on 27 July 2025 between Commission President von der Leyen and US President Trump in Turnberry, Scotland" |
| A fact sheet | 1, simplified | For journalists who won't read the 246-page PDF |
Instructions
Step 1: Prepare the Base
In a large Word document, combine pursuant to, hereinafter, and notwithstanding the foregoing. whisk until all meaning has been incorporated into nothing. The mixture should be thick, gray, and capable of supporting any interpretation β "it can produce an implausible number of interpretations that don't seem compatible with each other."
β οΈ Chef's note: Do not use plain English at this stage. Plain English causes the mixture to become transparent, which defeats the purpose.
Step 2: Add the Body
Fold in your selected regulatory frameworks. It doesn't matter which ones β they are "interchangeable" in flavor. The key is to cite them by name and number (e.g., "FINRA 2026 Annual Regulatory Oversight Report," "Regulation B implementing the Equal Credit Opportunity Act") so the document appears authoritative while remaining incomprehensible.
π‘ Tip: If two frameworks contradict each other, do not resolve the contradiction. Simply add another layer of subject to and in accordance with. The contradiction is not a bug β it is the texture.
Step 3: Apply the Dressing
Pour the dressing over the body and stir until completely opaque. The goal is a document where:
- A senator can claim it "protects consumers"
- A bank lobbyist can claim it "reduces regulatory burden"
- An economist can claim it "maintains safety and soundness"
- All three can be quoting the same paragraph
This is called consensus, and it is the hallmark of a well-dressed salad.
Step 4: Invoke Emergency Powers (Optional but Recommended)
If the courts strike down your salad, simply re-plate it under a different legal authority. In 2026, this technique was used to maintain tariffs after courts struck down earlier versions β the dish stays on the menu; only the citation changes.
Step 5: Garnish and Serve
- Upload the PDF to a
.govdomain - Issue a press release summarizing the salad in 3 bullet points (none of which appear in the actual document)
- Attach a "fact sheet" for journalists
- Tweet a chart with no axis labels
- Do not include a plain-language summary. If people understood it, they might object.
Serving Suggestions
| Occasion | Recommended Variation |
|---|---|
| Trade war escalation | Add a reciprocal tariff schedule and a joint statement from a dramatic location (Turnberry, Mar-a-Lago, etc.) |
| Banking crisis | Increase capital requirement modernization to 3 conflicting proposals; add "robust oversight" dressing liberally |
| Crypto scandal | Fold in tokenization "monitoring" (not regulation β monitoring); garnish with a Congressional report that "makes recommendations, including legislative, regulatory, and other proposals" (none specified) |
| Election season | Add "affordability" and "hardworking families" to the garnish. Do not change the body. |
| Food shortage | Do not add food. Add a tariff reversal on imported avocados and a SNAP cut. The salad must not contain actual food. |
Nutritional Information
| Nutrient | Content |
|---|---|
| Calories | 0 |
| Protein | 0 |
| Substantive policy | Trace amounts |
| Pages | 246 |
| Citations to itself | 14 |
| Citations to the Trade Act of 1974 | 7 |
| People who will read the full document | 3 (all lobbyists) |
| People affected | 330 million |
Storage
This salad keeps indefinitely. Unlike food, regulatory documents do not expire. They may be amended, superseded, or withdrawn β but the original remains on the .gov server forever, like a fossil of a meal no one ate.
To reheat: issue a "modernization" proposal that changes 3% of the text and generates 400 pages of public comments, none of which alter the outcome.
Chef's Final Note
The secret to a perfect Regulatory Report Salad is understanding that it is not meant to be eaten. It is meant to be served β placed on the table, photographed, cited in a press release, and left untouched while everyone argues about what it contains. The argument is the meal. The salad is the centerpiece that no one actually consumes.
And that, perhaps, is why no one is talking about growing more food. You cannot grow food from a Word document. You can only grow documents.
If this one landed, the next one will too.
Get new essays free, directly to your inbox.
Your response has a place here. Enemies of freedom do not.
Stay in the airlock β